SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Joani Sedaca

On record 3,013 decisions since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same period to ensure accuracy. While Sedaca has an 81% lifetime approval rate, recent data shows an 82% approval rate in the latest reporting period. This latest-period performance sits 24 points above the New York office average of 58%. These figures rely on a significant volume of cases to provide statistical confidence. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 81%
Decisions on record 3,013
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Sedaca New York National
Approval rate 82% 58% 58%
Fully favorable 68%
Denials 18%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Sedaca's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Sedaca
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval record for Sedaca shows a steady pattern across the 3,013 decisions on record since 2016. Yearly trends indicate consistent outcomes, with the most recent period showing an 82% approval rate, which aligns closely with the long-term average. This stability suggests a predictable approach to evaluating your evidence and testimony.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Sedaca's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the New York hearing office

The New York hearing office serves you and other claimants throughout the region. With 15 judges on record, the office maintains an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 58%. You can expect a structured environment where your evidence quality and medical documentation remain the primary drivers of a favorable decision. You can see the New York hearing office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 15 judges on record at this office since 2016, 5 of whom reported in SSA's latest period. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 36% to 81% on lifetime records. You can find more information on the New York hearing office page.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions