SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Evelyn M. Gunn

Last decided Los Angeles DowntownJul 2026
Decisions 2,315since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing performance requires looking at consistent data windows. While the office-wide approval rate for the latest period is 70%, Evelyn M. Gunn's latest-period rate is 59%. When evaluating her overall record since 2016, her 55% approval rate sits within the 38% to 78% range established by other judges whose most recent office on record is the Los Angeles Downtown hearing office. These figures rely on 2,315 decisions on record to provide a statistical view of past outcomes.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 55%
Decisions on record 2,315
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Gunn Los Angeles Downtown National
Approval rate 59% 70% 58%
Fully favorable 48% — —
Denials 41% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Gunn's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Gunn
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, Evelyn M. Gunn has maintained a consistent pattern across 2,315 decisions on record. While annual approval rates have fluctuated—ranging from a low of 49% in 2017 to a high of 61% in 2016—the data shows a steady trend overall. Her latest-period approval rate of 59% is consistent with her historical average, suggesting that recent case outcomes remain aligned with her established decision-making patterns.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Gunn's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Los Angeles Downtown hearing office

Evelyn M. Gunn's most recent office on record is the Los Angeles Downtown hearing office, with decisions there through July 2026. This office maintains a bench of 10 judges whose most recent office on record is this location. The office-wide approval rate for the latest period is 70%, which provides context for the local hearing environment.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Los Angeles Downtown

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 10 judges whose most recent office on record is the Los Angeles Downtown hearing office. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 38% to 78% on their since-2016 records. Preparation remains the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions