SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Michelle Thompson

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 3,814 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same period to ensure accuracy. While Michelle Thompson has a 74% lifetime approval rate, her latest-period performance shows an 87% approval rate, which sits 17 points above the Los Angeles Downtown office average of 70%. These figures are based on a substantial docket of 3,814 lifetime decisions. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 74%
Decisions on record 3,814
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Thompson Los Angeles Downtown National
Approval rate 87% 70% 58%
Fully favorable 73%
Denials 13%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Thompson's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Thompson
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, Michelle Thompson has maintained a generally upward trend in her approval rates. While the record shows some fluctuation, the most recent data indicates an 87% approval rate, suggesting a shift toward higher allowance levels compared to your earlier years on the bench. This pattern reflects a continuation of her recent activity, which has seen approval rates climb from 65% in 2021 to 86% in 2026.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Thompson's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Los Angeles Downtown hearing office

The Los Angeles Downtown hearing office serves you across California and is part of a busy regional network. The office bench consists of 10 judges on record, with an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 70%. You can expect a high volume of cases and should ensure your medical evidence is well-organized before your appearance. See the Los Angeles Downtown Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 10 judges on record at this office since 2016, 4 of whom reported in the latest period, with lifetime approval rates ranging from 38% to 78%. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions