Hortensia Haaversen's most recent office on record is the Washington hearing office, with decisions there through July 2026. Across the 4,859 decisions on record since January 2016, 62% have been approved. Judges whose most recent office on record is this one range from 29% to 85% on their since-2016 records, and case assignment is random. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing. An attorney can help you prepare for your hearing.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes. Hortensia Haaversen's 62% approval rate since 2016 provides a long-term view of decision-making, while the latest-period rate of 65% offers a more current snapshot. This latest figure sits 2 percentage points above the Washington office average of 63%, 6 points above the state average of 59%, and 7 points above the national average of 58%. These figures reflect recent trends in the Washington hearing office.
Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Haaversen's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
The approval trend for Hortensia Haaversen has shifted over the 4,859 decisions on record since 2016. After a period of fluctuation, the data shows a rise in approvals between 2022 and 2025, reaching 77% in 2024 and 2025. The 2026 fiscal year-to-date rate of 65% suggests a moderation from that recent peak. This pattern reflects changes in case volume and evidence quality over the last decade.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Haaversen's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
About the Washington hearing office
The Washington hearing office serves claimants in the District of Columbia and surrounding areas. As the most recent office on record for Hortensia Haaversen as of July 2026, it operates with a bench of 33 judges. The office maintains an overall latest-period approval rate of 63%, reflecting the local environment for disability claims.
Other judges whose most recent office on record is Washington
The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 33 judges whose most recent office on record is this one. These judges show a wide range of approval rates, spanning from 29% to 85% on their records since 2016. Preparation remains consistent regardless of which judge is assigned to your case.
Approval rates change with a lawyer
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
Frequently asked questions
Hortensia Haaversen's latest-period approval rate of 65% is 2 percentage points higher than the Washington office average of 63%. Because case assignment is random, an attorney can help you prepare for the specific evidentiary requirements of this bench.
Yes, the rate has fluctuated over the 4,859 decisions on record since 2016. While the judge saw a peak of 77% in 2024 and 2025, the 2026 year-to-date rate is 65%. An attorney can help you understand how these trends might relate to your specific case.
No. The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases to judges, and you cannot choose your judge. A qualified attorney can help you build a strong case regardless of who is assigned to your hearing.
The 62% approval rate on record since 2016 is a statistical observation of past decisions, not a guarantee of your outcome. Your success depends primarily on the medical evidence and documentation you provide. An attorney can help you ensure your file is complete and ready for review.




