Lisa R. Hall is an SSA Administrative Law Judge at the Paducah Hearing Office. Over 10 years on the bench and 20,927 lifetime decisions, they have maintained a 50% approval rate. This sits below the national average of 58%, though aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your specific hearing. An attorney can help you prepare for the specific requirements of Lisa R. Hall's courtroom.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
Judge Hall maintains a lifetime approval rate of 50% based on a docket of 20,927 decisions. In the most recent reporting period, your approval rate was 45%, which trails the current national average of 58% and the local Paducah office average of 56%. These figures provide a statistical baseline for understanding how cases have been decided in this courtroom over the last 10 years. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.
Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Hall's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
Over a decade on the bench, Judge Hall has seen approval rates move through several cycles. While rates remained above 50% during the early tenure, the data shows a period of decline between 2019 and 2022 before a rebound in 2023. The most recent data indicates a return to a 45% approval rate, reflecting the variability often seen in long-term judicial dockets. This trend suggests that your case outcome remains sensitive to the specific evidence and medical documentation presented in your file.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Hall's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
Hearing with Judge Hall? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.
Free Benefits ReviewAbout the Paducah hearing office
The Paducah Hearing Office serves a broad region of Kentucky, managing a high volume of disability claims. With a bench of 6 judges, the office processes thousands of cases annually to ensure timely hearings for local residents. The office currently maintains an approval rate of 56%, providing a local benchmark for your claim. You can visit the Paducah Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.
Other judges at this hearing office
The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning you cannot choose your judge. Within the Paducah Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the bench range from 42% to 65%. This variance highlights why focusing on the strength of your own medical evidence is the most effective strategy. The guidance for your preparation remains consistent regardless of which judge is assigned to your case.
Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer
SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
