SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Warren L. Hammond Jr.

Last decided MobileSep 2020
Decisions 1,780since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same timeframe to ensure accuracy. The 72% approval rate for Warren L. Hammond Jr. reflects his entire record since 2016, which we measure against the 28% to 81% range of other judges whose most recent office on record is also Mobile. This range highlights the variance in how different judges evaluate evidence and testimony. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 72%
Decisions on record 1,780

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Hammond Jr.. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 25, 2020. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Hammond Jr.'s docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Hammond Jr.
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY20
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval trend for Warren L. Hammond Jr. shows a shift across his 1,780 decisions on record since 2016. After maintaining a relatively high approval rate between 2016 and 2018, the data shows a decline in the final years of his recorded period. This pattern suggests that the judge's approach to case evidence may have evolved over time. Understanding these historical trends provides context for how your case might be evaluated.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Hammond Jr.'s bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Mobile hearing office

Warren L. Hammond Jr.'s most recent SSA record is at the Mobile hearing office, which serves claimants across Alabama. This office is part of a broader regional network and includes 18 judges whose most recent office on record is this one. You can expect a standard hearing process where the quality of medical evidence remains the primary factor in a decision. You can see the Mobile Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Mobile

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. At the Mobile hearing office, there are 18 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, with approval rates ranging from 28% to 81%. This variance underscores why thorough preparation is essential regardless of your specific assignment. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions