SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Pearline Hardy

Last decided Topeka KSJul 2026
Decisions 2,373since 2017

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes. Pearline Hardy's 60% approval rate on record since 2017 provides a baseline, while her latest-period approval rate of 66% sits 22 points above the office average of 44%. These figures are drawn from a volume of 2,373 decisions. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2017
Approval rate 60%
Decisions on record 2,373
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Hardy Topeka KS National
Approval rate 66% 44% 58%
Fully favorable 48% — —
Denials 34% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Hardy's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Hardy
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY18FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since December 2017, Pearline Hardy has issued 2,373 decisions. Her approval rate has fluctuated over time, including a 66% approval rate in the partial 2026 fiscal year. This latest-period performance represents a shift compared to her historical average. The recent trend reflects a varied pattern, which may be influenced by changes in case complexity or the specific evidence you present in your hearing.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Hardy's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Topeka KS hearing office

Pearline Hardy's most recent office on record is the Topeka KS hearing office, with decisions there through July 2026. This office serves you and other claimants across the region, maintaining an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 44%. You can expect a standardized hearing process focused on the medical and vocational evidence of your disability claim.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Topeka KS

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 9 judges whose most recent office on record is this one. Approval rates across this bench range from 24% to 60% on their records since 2016. For your preparation, the guidance remains consistent regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions