SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Catherine Harper

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 3,663 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

The approval rates for Catherine Harper are measured against the broader context of the Raleigh hearing office. Across the office's 17 judges on record, lifetime approval rates range from 27% to 74%. In the latest reporting period, Catherine Harper maintained an approval rate of 73%, which is 12 percentage points higher than the office average of 61%. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 60%
Decisions on record 3,663
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Harper Raleigh National
Approval rate 73% 61% 58%
Fully favorable 66%
Denials 27%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Harper's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Harper
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, the decision pattern for Catherine Harper has shown notable fluctuations. After starting with a 49% approval rate in 2016, the figures moved between 57% and 64% for several years before a recent shift. The latest period shows a 73% approval rate, marking a significant increase compared to the 51% seen in 2025. This recent uptick may reflect changes in case mix or the quality of evidence presented in the most recent docket.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Harper's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Raleigh hearing office

The Raleigh hearing office serves you throughout North Carolina and the surrounding region. The office maintains a diverse bench of 17 judges on record, with an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 61%. You can expect a standard administrative hearing process focused on medical and vocational evidence. For more information, see the Raleigh Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning you cannot choose your judge. There are 17 judges on record at this office since 2016, 10 of whom reported in the latest period. With lifetime approval rates ranging from 27% to 74% across the bench, the judge you are assigned can influence the process. Preparation remains consistent regardless of the specific judge assigned to your case.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions