SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Lloyd E. Hartford

Last decided BillingsSep 2018
Decisions 490since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

The approval rate for Lloyd E. Hartford is based on 490 decisions recorded between 2016 and 2018. When evaluating this figure, it is helpful to compare it against the broader bench at the Billings hearing office, where judges range from 32% to 70% in their since-2016 approval rates. This variation highlights the importance of understanding the specific bench dynamics at your hearing location.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 33%
Decisions on record 490

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Hartford. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 28, 2018. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Hartford's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Hartford
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY18
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Lloyd E. Hartford's approval rate shows a fluctuating pattern across the data window starting in 2016. After an initial approval rate of 29% in 2016, the rate rose to 38% in 2017 before settling at 28% in 2018. These shifts often reflect changes in the complexity of cases or the specific evidence presented during those periods. This pattern demonstrates that while consistency is a goal, your individual case outcome depends heavily on the specific medical and vocational evidence you provide.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Hartford's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Billings hearing office

The Billings hearing office serves you and other claimants across Montana and the surrounding region. This office has a bench of 13 judges whose most recent office on record is this location. You can expect a formal administrative process focused on the specific medical documentation of your disability.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Billings

The Social Security Administration assigns cases to judges using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 13 judges whose most recent office on record is the Billings hearing office, with approval rates ranging from 32% to 70% on their since-2016 records. Because each judge has a unique approach to evaluating evidence, understanding the local bench is a standard part of your hearing preparation.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions