SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Mattie Harvin-Woode

Last decided NHC St LouisJul 2026
Decisions 1,774since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes. The 53% approval rate for Mattie Harvin-Woode reflects all decisions on record since 2016, which you can measure against the 40% to 79% range of other judges at the NHC St Louis. In the most recent reporting period, the judge's 49% approval rate compares against the office's 45% rate, the state's 51% rate, and the 58% national average.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 53%
Decisions on record 1,774
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Harvin-Woode NHC St Louis National
Approval rate 49% 45% 58%
Fully favorable 41% — —
Denials 51% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Harvin-Woode's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Harvin-Woode
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since January 2016, Mattie Harvin-Woode has issued 1,774 decisions. The yearly approval trend has fluctuated, with a 51% approval rate recorded for the 2026 fiscal year to date. These figures reflect historical patterns rather than a fixed outcome for your specific hearing.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Harvin-Woode's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the NHC St Louis hearing office

The NHC St Louis is the most recent office on record for Mattie Harvin-Woode, with recorded decisions through July 2026. This office serves claimants across Missouri and the surrounding region, maintaining a bench of 15 judges. The office-wide approval rate in the latest reporting period was 45%.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is NHC St Louis

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 15 judges whose most recent office on record is the NHC St Louis. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 40% to 79% on their since-2016 records.

Judges with similar approval rates

These active judges' approval rates in SSA's latest period (October 1, 2025 – July 31, 2026) are closest to Judge Harvin-Woode's 49%. All five last decided cases in Missouri.

Rates within 5 points of each other are hard to tell apart at a typical caseload, so treat these as judges with comparable records, not a ranking. See Judge Harvin-Woode and the three closest side by side →

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions