SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Norman Hemming

Last decided Miami OHOJul 2026
Decisions 2,689since 2017

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Over the 12 months to July 31, 2026, Norman Hemming's 73% approval rate sits above the 64% office average, 59% state average, and 58% national average. These figures are based on 327 decisions. These aggregate rates describe past decisions rather than predicting the outcome of your specific hearing.

Last 12 months July 26, 2025 – July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Hemming Miami OHO National
Approval rate 73% 64% 58%
Fully favorable 71% — —
Denials 27% — —
Decisions 327 — —
All decisions on record SSA records since 2017
Approval rate 60%
Decisions on record 2,689

SSA publishes no office- or national-level breakdown of fully favorable and denial rates. The 12 months are SSA's figures for this fiscal year to date plus the rest of the previous fiscal year; how we calculate them.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Hemming's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Hemming
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY17FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since February 2017, Norman Hemming has issued 2,689 decisions. His approval rate has fluctuated over this period, starting at 82% in 2017. Recent data shows a 72% approval rate for 2026 fiscal year to date, which is higher than his 60% average since 2017.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Hemming's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Miami OHO hearing office

The Miami OHO is the judge's most recent office on record, with decisions logged there through July 2026. The office maintained a 64% approval rate over the 12 months to July 31, 2026. You can find the full roster of judges on the Miami OHO Hearing Office page.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Miami OHO

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning your judge is assigned randomly. Approval rates vary across the bench, with the 8 judges who decided cases here in SSA's latest file ranging from 48% to 97% over the 12 months to July 31, 2026. There are 13 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, and 8 of them decided cases here in SSA's latest file. You can find more information on the Miami OHO Hearing Office page.

Judges with similar approval rates

These active judges' approval rates over the same 12 months (July 26, 2025 – July 31, 2026) are closest to Judge Hemming's 73%. All five last decided cases in Florida.

Rates within 5 points of each other are hard to tell apart at a typical caseload, so treat these as judges with comparable records, not a ranking. See Judge Hemming and the three closest side by side →

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions