SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. John A. Henderson

Last decided Dallas NorthSep 2019
Decisions 679since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

The 46% approval rate for John A. Henderson reflects his performance across 679 decisions on record since 2016. This figure sits within the broader range of 24% to 88% observed among the 20 judges whose most recent office on record is the Dallas North hearing office. These aggregate rates describe past decisions rather than predicting outcomes for your specific hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 46%
Decisions on record 679

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Henderson. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 27, 2019. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Henderson's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Henderson
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY19
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for John A. Henderson was 50% in 2016, 50% in 2017, 44% in 2018, and 48% in 2019. These 679 decisions on record since 2016 provide a view of his decision-making history during that period. Yearly fluctuations in approval rates are common and often reflect changes in the specific evidence or medical documentation presented in the cases assigned to a judge.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Henderson's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Dallas North hearing office

John A. Henderson's most recent office on record is the Dallas North hearing office, where he recorded decisions through September 2019. This office serves the North Texas region and is part of a larger network of hearing locations that handle a high volume of SSDI claims. With a bench of 20 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, the office maintains a diverse range of decision patterns.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Dallas North

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 20 judges whose most recent office on record is the Dallas North hearing office, with approval rates ranging from 24% to 88% on their since-2016 records. Because case assignment is outside of your control, focusing on the strength of your medical evidence is the most effective way to prepare for your hearing.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions