Thomas J. Wheeler is an SSA Administrative Law Judge at the Dallas North Hearing Office. Over 10 years on the bench and 25,748 lifetime decisions, he has maintained a 48% approval rate. This sits 17 points below the current office average and 10 points below the national median. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing. An attorney can help you prepare for the specific requirements of this judge's courtroom.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
Judge Wheeler has issued 25,748 lifetime decisions during his 10-year tenure. In the most recent reporting period, his approval rate stood at 48%, which contrasts with the 65% average at the Dallas North Hearing Office and the 58% national average. These figures provide a statistical baseline for understanding how cases have been decided in his courtroom over time. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.
Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Wheeler's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
Over the past decade, your judge's approval rate has ranged from a low of 42% in 2016 to a high of 55% in 2020. More recently, the rate has been 52% in 2024 and 49% in 2025. This pattern reflects a consistent approach to evaluating evidence over the long term.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Wheeler's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
Hearing with Judge Wheeler? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.
Check My BenefitsAbout the Dallas North Odar hearing office
The Dallas North Hearing Office serves a large population across Texas, managing a high volume of disability claims. With a bench of 6 judges, the office maintains an active docket and processes thousands of hearings annually. The office currently reports an approval rate of 65%. You can visit the Dallas North Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.
Other judges at this hearing office
The Social Security Administration assigns cases to judges using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning your assignment is essentially random. Within the Dallas North Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the bench vary significantly, ranging from 48% to 80%. Because you cannot choose your judge, you should focus on the strength of your medical evidence and testimony.
Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer
SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
