SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Helen E. Hesse

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Orange Hearing Office · 2 years on the bench · 2,856 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Hesse?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Judge Hesse has maintained a 29% lifetime approval rate across 2,856 total decisions. When compared to the latest reporting period, this judge's rate sits 33 points below the Orange office average and 29 points below the national average. These figures are derived from a significant docket, providing a clear view of historical trends. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Metric Judge Hesse Orange National
Approval rate 29% 62% 58%
Fully favorable 25%
Denials 71%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Hesse's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Hesse
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY17
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over a 2-year tenure, Judge Hesse has demonstrated a consistent approach to disability claims. The yearly trend shows a movement from a 28% approval rate in 2016 to 32% in 2017. This indicates that the judge's decision-making has remained within a stable range throughout their time on the bench. The data reflects a steady pattern in your case evaluation.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Hesse's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Hesse? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Orange hearing office

The Orange Hearing Office serves a large population in California, managing a high volume of SSDI claims. With a bench of 6 judges, the office currently reports an approval rate of 62%. You can expect a standard administrative process focused on your medical evidence and vocational testimony. You can see the Orange Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your judge is selected randomly. At the Orange Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates across the bench range from 29% to 59%. Because of this variance, understanding the office environment is helpful for your preparation. You can find more information on the Orange Hearing Office page.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions