SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Mason Hogan

Last decided RaleighSep 2025
Decisions 3,497since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes. The 56% approval rate for Mason Hogan reflects all decisions on record since 2016, which can be measured against the 27% to 74% range of other judges whose most recent office on record is Raleigh. This docket of 3,497 decisions provides a foundation for understanding past trends. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 56%
Decisions on record 3,497

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Hogan. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 26, 2025. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Hogan's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Hogan
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Mason Hogan has fluctuated over the 3,497 decisions on record since January 2016. After an initial period of variance, the trend showed a decline toward 2020 and 2021 before experiencing a recovery in more recent years. The latest period reflects a continuation of this pattern, showing a return to levels observed earlier in the record. This trend suggests that the judge's approach remains consistent with historical averages.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Hogan's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Raleigh hearing office

Mason Hogan's most recent office on record is the Raleigh hearing office, with decisions there through September 2025. This office serves you across North Carolina and operates with a bench of 17 judges whose most recent records are tied to this location. You can expect a standard hearing process where evidence quality is the primary factor in the outcome. You can see the Raleigh Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Raleigh

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 17 judges whose most recent office on record is Raleigh, and their approval rates since 2016 range from 27% to 74%. Because assignment is outside of your control, the focus should remain on the strength of your medical evidence. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions