SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. David L. Horton

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Birmingham Hearing Office · 3 years on the bench · 6,856 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Horton?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Judge Horton maintains a lifetime approval rate of 51%, which is slightly below the current Birmingham office average of 52% and the national average of 58%. These figures are derived from a docket of 6,856 lifetime decisions. Comparing these rates helps you understand the local landscape of your disability claim. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Metric Judge Horton Birmingham National
Approval rate 51% 52% 58%
Fully favorable 43%
Denials 49%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Horton's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Horton
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY18
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over his 3 years on the bench, Judge Horton saw his approval rate shift from 55% in 2016 to 46% by 2018. This trend reflects the volume and nature of cases handled during his tenure. While the latest period shows a rate slightly below the office average, it remains within a stable range for the Birmingham office. This pattern suggests that the judge's approach to evidence and testimony has evolved over his time in the role.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Horton's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Horton? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Birmingham hearing office

The Birmingham Hearing Office serves a large population across Alabama, managing a high volume of disability claims with a team of 6 judges. The office currently maintains an average approval rate of 52%, reflecting regional trends in SSDI adjudication. You can expect a formal hearing process where medical documentation and vocational testimony are central to the outcome. You can visit the Birmingham Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to Judge Horton is essentially random. Across the Birmingham office, lifetime approval rates among the 6 judges range from 38% to 77%. This variance highlights why focusing on the strength of your medical evidence is more important than the specific judge assigned. You can find more information on the Birmingham Hearing Office page.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions