SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Dierdra Howard

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Washington Hearing Office · 5 years on the bench · 6,969 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Howard?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Judge Howard’s approval rate is evaluated against the Washington Hearing Office latest average of 61% and the national benchmark of 58%. With a career spanning 5 years on the bench, the data provides a stable look at historical decision-making trends. These comparisons help you understand the broader context of your hearing environment. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Metric Judge Howard Washington National
Approval rate 55% 61% 58%
Fully favorable 47%
Denials 45%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Howard's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Howard
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY18FY22
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over the course of 6,969 lifetime decisions, Judge Howard has shown a shifting trend in approval patterns. While early years saw approval rates in the 57% to 62% range, more recent data reflects a lower approval frequency. This divergence from the lifetime average may be influenced by changes in the types of cases assigned or the specific evidence presented. The latest period reflects a continuation of this more conservative trend.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Howard's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Howard? See if a free benefits review fits your case.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Washington hearing office

The Washington (District of Columbia) Hearing Office serves a diverse population across the region, managing a high volume of disability claims. With a bench of 6 judges, the office maintains a latest approval rate of 61%. You should be prepared for a rigorous review of medical evidence and vocational testimony. You can see the Washington Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. Within the Washington Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the bench range from 33% to 55%. Because of this variance, understanding the landscape of your local office is a standard part of hearing preparation. You can view the full office roster on the Washington Hearing Office page.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions