SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Dierdra Howard

Last decided WashingtonSep 2022
Decisions 1,061since 2018

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Evaluating a judge's history requires looking at the broader context of their hearing office. With 1,061 decisions on record since 2018, Howard provides a significant data set for analysis. This approval rate of 56% sits within the 29% to 85% range observed among the 33 judges whose most recent office on record is Washington. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2018
Approval rate 56%
Decisions on record 1,061

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Howard. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 30, 2022. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Howard's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Howard
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY18FY22
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval trend for Howard shows variation over the recorded period from 2018 to 2022. After an initial approval rate of 57% in 2018, the figures rose to 62% in 2019 before experiencing a decline in the final years of the record. This shift in the later period reflects a departure from the earlier, higher approval patterns. Such trends often emerge from changes in case complexity or the specific medical evidence presented in your file.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Howard's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Washington hearing office

The Washington hearing office serves claimants throughout the District of Columbia and surrounding areas. This office maintains a bench of 33 judges whose most recent office on record is this location. You can expect a formal process where the quality of your medical documentation is paramount. You can see the Washington hearing office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Washington

The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 33 judges whose most recent office on record is Washington, with approval rates ranging from 29% to 85%. Because assignment is outside of your control, the focus remains on building a robust case. You can find more information on the Washington hearing office page.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions