SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Robert Iafe

Last decided San DiegoJul 2026
Decisions 2,411since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes. While the overall approval rate on record since 2016 is 58%, recent performance shows a 66% approval rate in the latest reporting period. This latest-period figure sits 8 percentage points above the office average. These statistics are based on a significant volume of 2,411 decisions, providing a stable view of past activity. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 58%
Decisions on record 2,411
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Iafe San Diego National
Approval rate 66% 58% 58%
Fully favorable 54% — —
Denials 34% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Iafe's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Iafe
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, the approval rate for Robert Iafe has shown yearly fluctuations, ranging from a low of 50% in 2025 to a high of 66% in 2026. With 2,411 total decisions on record, the pattern indicates that approval outcomes are not static. The latest reporting period shows a 66% approval rate, which is higher than the average observed over the full data window. This recent uptick may reflect changes in case mix or evidence quality.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Iafe's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the San Diego hearing office

The San Diego Hearing Office is the most recent office on record for Robert Iafe, with activity documented through July 2026. This office serves claimants across the region and maintains a bench of 15 judges. The office-wide approval rate in the latest period was 58%. You can expect a standard hearing process focused on medical and vocational evidence. You may see the San Diego Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is San Diego

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 15 judges whose most recent office on record is the San Diego Hearing Office. Approval rates among this bench range from 37% to 68% for records since 2016. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions