SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Karen R. Jackson

Last decided LexingtonJul 2026
Decisions 4,478since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same timeframe to ensure accuracy. While the judge's since-2016 approval rate provides a broad view of her docket, the latest-period figures offer a snapshot of recent trends. These rates are evaluated against the performance of the broader bench at the Lexington hearing office.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 46%
Decisions on record 4,478
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Jackson Lexington National
Approval rate 48% 50% 58%
Fully favorable 40% — —
Denials 52% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Jackson's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Jackson
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since January 2016, Karen R. Jackson has issued 4,478 decisions. Her yearly approval rate has fluctuated, ranging from 40% in 2016 to 48% in 2026. This recent data reflects a continuation of her overall decision-making history.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Jackson's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Lexington hearing office

Karen R. Jackson's most recent office on record is the Lexington hearing office, with decisions there through July 2026. This office maintains a bench of 18 judges whose most recent office on record is this location. The office-wide latest-period approval rate is 50%.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Lexington

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 18 judges whose most recent office on record is the Lexington hearing office. Approval rates for this bench range from 21% to 79% on their records since 2016.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions