SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Jonathan Stanley

Last decided LexingtonJul 2026
Decisions 4,496since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Over the 12 months to July 31, 2026, Jonathan Stanley's 54% approval rate sits above the 50% office average and 51% state average, though below the 58% national mark. These figures are based on 496 decisions. Aggregate rates describe past decisions rather than predicting outcomes for your specific hearing.

Last 12 months July 26, 2025 – July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Stanley Lexington National
Approval rate 54% 50% 58%
Fully favorable 48% — —
Denials 46% — —
Decisions 496 — —
All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 53%
Decisions on record 4,496

SSA publishes no office- or national-level breakdown of fully favorable and denial rates. The 12 months are SSA's figures for this fiscal year to date plus the rest of the previous fiscal year; how we calculate them.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Stanley's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Stanley
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, Jonathan Stanley has issued 4,496 decisions. The yearly approval rate has fluctuated, reaching a high of 60% in 2024 and a low of 44% in 2018. The most recent 12 months, with a 54% approval rate, sit near the long-term average of 53% recorded since 2016.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Stanley's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Lexington hearing office

The Lexington hearing office is the most recent office on record for 18 judges as of July 2026. Over the 12 months to July 31, 2026, the office maintained a 50% approval rate. You can expect a standard administrative process focused on the evidence provided in your file.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Lexington

Among the 10 judges who decided cases here in SSA's latest file, approval rates range from 38% to 55% over the 12 months to July 31, 2026. There are 18 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, with 10 of them having decided cases in the latest file.

Judges with similar approval rates

These active judges' approval rates over the same 12 months (July 26, 2025 – July 31, 2026) are closest to Judge Stanley's 54%. All five last decided cases in Kentucky.

Rates within 5 points of each other are hard to tell apart at a typical caseload, so treat these as judges with comparable records, not a ranking. See Judge Stanley and the three closest side by side →

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions