SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Meredith L. Jacques

Last decided Toledo OHJul 2026
Decisions 1,510since 2023

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Evaluating your judge's approval rate requires looking at both their long-term record and recent trends. While the 50% approval rate since 2023 provides a baseline, it is helpful to compare this against the 30% to 77% range seen among the bench at the Toledo OH office. Recent data shows a 53% approval rate in the latest period, which sits 1 point below the office average of 54%. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2023
Approval rate 50%
Decisions on record 1,510
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Jacques Toledo OH National
Approval rate 53% 54% 58%
Fully favorable 39% — —
Denials 47% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Jacques's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Jacques
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY23FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2023, the judge has issued 1,510 decisions with a yearly approval trend that has fluctuated. After an approval rate of 49% in 2023 and 51% in 2024, the rate shifted to 46% in 2025 before rising to 53% in the partial 2026 fiscal year. These variations often stem from changes in the complexity of cases or the quality of medical evidence presented at your hearing.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Jacques's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Toledo OH hearing office

The Toledo OH hearing office serves claimants throughout the region and maintains a diverse bench of 10 judges. In the latest reporting period, the office-wide approval rate was 54%. You can expect a formal process where the quality of your medical documentation remains the primary factor in a favorable decision. You can see the Toledo OH Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Toledo OH

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 10 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, and 7 of them decided cases here in the latest file through July 2026. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 30% to 77% on record. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions