SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Noceeba Southern

Last decided Toledo OHJul 2026
Decisions 4,148since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

The approval rate for Noceeba Southern is 51% since 2016, a figure derived from a docket of 4,148 decisions. When comparing this to the broader bench at the Toledo OH hearing office, where judges range from 30% to 77% in their approval rates, it is clear that individual judicial patterns vary. In the most recent reporting period, the judge maintained a 60% approval rate, which is 6 points above the office average of 54%. These figures reflect historical trends rather than specific outcomes for your case.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 51%
Decisions on record 4,148
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Southern Toledo OH National
Approval rate 60% 54% 58%
Fully favorable 41% — —
Denials 40% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Southern's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Southern
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since April 2016, the approval rate for Noceeba Southern has fluctuated, moving from 46% in 2016 to 60% in the most recent partial fiscal year. The record includes 4,148 decisions, reflecting a variable approach to case evaluation. The latest 60% approval rate follows a 49% rate in 2025. These shifts often correspond to changes in the types of cases or evidence presented in the courtroom.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Southern's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Toledo OH hearing office

The most recent office on record for Noceeba Southern is the Toledo OH hearing office. This office maintains a bench of 10 judges who manage a high volume of disability claims. With an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 54%, you can expect a review of your medical and vocational evidence. You can see the Toledo OH hearing office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Toledo OH

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. At the Toledo OH hearing office, there are 10 judges whose most recent office on record is this one. These judges show a wide range of approval rates, spanning from 30% to 77% on their records since 2016. Your preparation remains consistent regardless of which judge is assigned to your case.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions