SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Lisa M. Johnson

Last decided BirminghamJul 2026
Decisions 3,202since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes. While your judge's 45% approval rate covers all decisions since 2016, the latest-period data provides a snapshot of current trends. The Birmingham hearing office bench shows a wide range of outcomes, from 28% to 85% on since-2016 records. These figures offer a statistical baseline for understanding the hearing environment.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 45%
Decisions on record 3,202
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Johnson Birmingham National
Approval rate 44% 49% 58%
Fully favorable 36% — —
Denials 56% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Johnson's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Johnson
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Lisa M. Johnson has fluctuated across the 3,202 decisions on record since 2016. After a high of 59% in 2016, the rate saw a period of decline before stabilizing in recent years. The latest-period approval rate of 44% remains consistent with the broader trend observed over the last decade.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Johnson's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Birmingham hearing office

Lisa M. Johnson's most recent office on record is the Birmingham hearing office, which serves claimants across Alabama. This office maintains a bench of 23 judges, reflecting a diverse range of decision patterns. The office-wide latest-period approval rate is 49%, providing context for the local hearing environment.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Birmingham

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your specific judge is essentially random. There are 23 judges whose most recent office on record is the Birmingham hearing office, with 7 of them having decided cases here in the latest file from July 2026. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 28% to 85% on their since-2016 records.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions