SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Matthew Johnson

Last decided Orland ParkSep 2019
Decisions 1,472since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same time periods to ensure accuracy. The 49% approval rate for Matthew Johnson reflects all decisions on record since 2016, which we compare against the 25% to 69% range of other judges at the same office during that same window. This docket size of 1,472 decisions provides a stable view of past patterns. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 49%
Decisions on record 1,472

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Johnson. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 27, 2019. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Johnson's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Johnson
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY19
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Matthew Johnson shows a shift over the 1,472 decisions on record since 2016. You can see an initial approval rate of 57% in 2016, followed by a decline to 45% in 2018, before reaching 48% in 2019. This pattern illustrates how the judge has evaluated cases in the past.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Johnson's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Orland Park hearing office

The Orland Park hearing office serves you if you are in Illinois and the surrounding region. There are 9 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, and the office-wide latest-period approval rate is 43%. You can expect a formal administrative process focused on medical evidence and vocational testimony.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Orland Park

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. At the Orland Park office, there are 9 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, with approval rates ranging from 25% to 69% on their since-2016 records. For your preparation, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions