SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Alice Jordan

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Greenville Hearing Office · 10 years on the bench · 17,959 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Jordan?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Judge Jordan maintains a lifetime approval rate of 55%, which provides a statistical baseline for understanding how cases have been decided over the last decade. In the most recent reporting period, the judge recorded a 58% approval rate, aligning with the national average of 58% but trailing the Greenville office average of 65%. These figures are derived from a docket of 17,959 lifetime decisions. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Metric Judge Jordan Greenville National
Approval rate 55% 65% 58%
Fully favorable 40%
Denials 42%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Jordan's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Jordan
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over 10 years on the bench, Judge Jordan has seen fluctuations in approval rates, ranging from 48% in 2017 to a peak of 63% in 2023. The data shows a period of rising approval rates between 2021 and 2023, followed by a stabilization in the most recent period. This pattern suggests a judge who responds to shifts in case complexity and evidence quality. The current 58% rate reflects a continuation of this steady pattern within the broader context of the judge's career.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Jordan's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Jordan? A free benefit check tells you if you qualify.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Greenville hearing office

The Greenville Hearing Office serves a broad population across South Carolina, managing a high volume of disability claims with a bench of 6 judges. The office currently maintains an approval rate of 65%, reflecting the regional trends in SSDI adjudication. You can expect a professional environment focused on the rigorous evaluation of your medical records and vocational testimony.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. Across the Greenville Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the 6 judges range from 44% to 65%. While these variations exist, the fundamental requirements for proving disability remain consistent across all courtrooms.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions