Alice Jordan is an SSA Administrative Law Judge at the Greenville hearing office. The lifetime approval rate of 55% across 17,959 lifetime decisions sits slightly below the national average of 58%. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing. An attorney can help you prepare a case tailored to the specific evidentiary standards of this bench.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
Judge Jordan maintains a lifetime approval rate of 55%, which provides a statistical baseline for understanding how cases have been decided over the last decade. In the most recent reporting period, the judge recorded a 58% approval rate, aligning with the national average of 58% but trailing the Greenville office average of 65%. These figures are derived from a docket of 17,959 lifetime decisions. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.
Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Jordan's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
Over 10 years on the bench, Judge Jordan has seen fluctuations in approval rates, ranging from 48% in 2017 to a peak of 63% in 2023. The data shows a period of rising approval rates between 2021 and 2023, followed by a stabilization in the most recent period. This pattern suggests a judge who responds to shifts in case complexity and evidence quality. The current 58% rate reflects a continuation of this steady pattern within the broader context of the judge's career.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Jordan's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
Hearing with Judge Jordan? A free benefit check tells you if you qualify.
Free Benefits ReviewAbout the Greenville hearing office
The Greenville Hearing Office serves a broad population across South Carolina, managing a high volume of disability claims with a bench of 6 judges. The office currently maintains an approval rate of 65%, reflecting the regional trends in SSDI adjudication. You can expect a professional environment focused on the rigorous evaluation of your medical records and vocational testimony.
Other judges at this hearing office
The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. Across the Greenville Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the 6 judges range from 44% to 65%. While these variations exist, the fundamental requirements for proving disability remain consistent across all courtrooms.
Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer
SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
