SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Howard Kauffman

Last decided HarrisburgJul 2026
Decisions 4,035since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes to ensure accuracy. The 40% approval rate for Howard Kauffman covers all decisions on record since 2016, while the latest-period data provides a snapshot of recent activity. Within the Harrisburg hearing office, the bench shows a wide range of approval rates from 17% to 86% since 2016. These figures offer context for the local environment, though aggregate rates describe past decisions rather than predicting your individual outcome.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 40%
Decisions on record 4,035
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Kauffman Harrisburg National
Approval rate 43% 43% 58%
Fully favorable 34% — —
Denials 57% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Kauffman's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Kauffman
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Howard Kauffman has remained relatively steady across the 4,035 decisions on record since January 2016. While annual fluctuations occurred, your judge maintained a consistent approach to case evaluation throughout this period. The latest-period approval rate of 43% aligns with the broader office average, suggesting that the recent trend reflects a continuation of this established pattern.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Kauffman's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Harrisburg hearing office

The Harrisburg hearing office is the most recent office on record for Howard Kauffman as of July 2026. This office operates with a bench of 13 judges who manage a high volume of disability claims. The office-wide approval rate in the latest period was 43%, providing a baseline for local hearing outcomes. You can see the Harrisburg hearing office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Harrisburg

The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 13 judges whose most recent office on record is the Harrisburg hearing office, and 5 of them decided cases here in the latest file from July 2026. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 17% to 86% since 2016. Preparation remains essential regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions