SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Richard E. Guida

On record 4,569 decisions since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at the same timeframes to ensure accuracy. Richard E. Guida's lifetime record of 29% sits within the Harrisburg office-wide lifetime range of 17% to 86%. In the most recent reporting period, his 24% approval rate is 19 points lower than the office average of 43%. These figures are based on a large docket of 4,569 lifetime decisions, providing a stable statistical foundation. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 29%
Decisions on record 4,569
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Guida Harrisburg National
Approval rate 24% 43% 58%
Fully favorable 20%
Denials 76%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Guida's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Guida
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, your judge's approval rate has shown variance, moving from 32% in the early years to 24% in the most recent period. This trend reflects a shift in outcomes over his 4,569 lifetime decisions. While the latest-period denial rate of 76% is notable, each case is unique and depends heavily on the medical evidence you provide. The recent data suggests a consistent pattern of decision-making that differs from the office-wide average.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Guida's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Harrisburg hearing office

The Harrisburg hearing office serves you and other claimants across the region, operating as a critical hub for disability adjudication in Pennsylvania. The office maintains a diverse bench of 13 judges who handle a high volume of cases. With an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 43%, you should be prepared for a rigorous review of your medical documentation. You can see the Harrisburg Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning you cannot request a specific judge. There are 13 judges on record at the Harrisburg office, with 5 currently reporting in the latest SSA data. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 17% to 86% over their respective careers. You can review the office-wide performance to understand the broader context of your hearing.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions