SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Richard E. Guida

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 4,569 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at the same timeframes to ensure accuracy. Richard E. Guida's lifetime record of 29% sits within the Harrisburg office-wide lifetime range of 17% to 86%. In the most recent reporting period, his 24% approval rate is 19 points lower than the office average of 43%. These figures are based on a large docket of 4,569 lifetime decisions, providing a stable statistical foundation. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 29%
Decisions on record 4,569
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Guida Harrisburg National
Approval rate 24% 43% 58%
Fully favorable 20%
Denials 76%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Guida's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Guida
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, your judge's approval rate has shown variance, moving from 32% in the early years to 24% in the most recent period. This trend reflects a shift in outcomes over his 4,569 lifetime decisions. While the latest-period denial rate of 76% is notable, each case is unique and depends heavily on the medical evidence you provide. The recent data suggests a consistent pattern of decision-making that differs from the office-wide average.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Guida's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Harrisburg hearing office

The Harrisburg hearing office serves you and other claimants across the region, operating as a critical hub for disability adjudication in Pennsylvania. The office maintains a diverse bench of 13 judges who handle a high volume of cases. With an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 43%, you should be prepared for a rigorous review of your medical documentation. You can see the Harrisburg Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning you cannot request a specific judge. There are 13 judges on record at the Harrisburg office, with 5 currently reporting in the latest SSA data. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 17% to 86% over their respective careers. You can review the office-wide performance to understand the broader context of your hearing.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions