SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. James Kearns

Last decided New York VarickJul 2026
Decisions 1,581since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes. James Kearns's 64% approval rate on record since 2016 sits within the 48% to 85% range of other judges whose most recent office on record is New York Varick. In the latest reporting period, James Kearns's 64% approval rate compares to the office rate of 66%, the state rate of 62%, and the national rate of 58%. These figures reflect recent trends rather than the judge's long-term average.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 64%
Decisions on record 1,581
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Kearns New York Varick National
Approval rate 64% 66% 58%
Fully favorable 60% — —
Denials 36% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Kearns's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Kearns
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, James Kearns has issued 1,581 decisions, showing a variable trend over the last decade. After an initial period of fluctuation, the approval rate saw a notable peak in 2018 and again in 2025. The most recent data from 2026 shows a 63% approval rate, which remains consistent with the long-term average. This pattern indicates that while annual approval rates shift, the overall approach has remained relatively stable over the observed window.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Kearns's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the New York Varick hearing office

The New York Varick hearing office serves you across the region. As of July 2026, it is the most recent office on record for 10 judges. The office maintains a latest-period approval rate of 66%, providing a local benchmark for your hearing. You can view the New York Varick Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is New York Varick

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. At the New York Varick office, there are 10 judges whose most recent office on record is this location. Approval rates among this bench range from 48% to 85% on their records since 2016. You should prepare your case thoroughly regardless of which judge is assigned to your hearing.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions