SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. James Kearns

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the New York Hearing Office · 10 years on the bench · 8,609 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Kearns?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Judge Kearns maintains a lifetime approval rate of 64% across 8,609 lifetime decisions. In the most recent reporting period, his approval rate reached 71%, which is 4 percentage points higher than the New York office average and 6 percentage points above the national average. These figures provide a statistical baseline for understanding his courtroom history, though they do not predict the outcome of your specific hearing.

Metric Judge Kearns New York National
Approval rate 64% 60% 58%
Fully favorable 66%
Denials 29%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Kearns's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Kearns
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over a decade on the bench, Judge Kearns has seen his approval rates fluctuate, ranging from a low of 53% in 2023 to a high of 75% in 2018. The recent trend shows a return to higher approval levels, with a 69% rate recorded in 2025. This pattern suggests a stable approach to case evaluation that remains responsive to the evidence you present.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Kearns's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Kearns? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the New York hearing office

The New York Hearing Office serves a large population across the region, managing a high volume of disability claims. With a bench of 6 judges, the office handles a diverse range of cases, reflecting the complex medical and vocational needs of the local workforce. The office-wide approval rate currently sits at 60%, providing a benchmark for the local administrative environment.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to Judge Kearns is essentially random. Across the New York office, lifetime approval rates for the 6 ALJs range from 37% to 82%. This variance highlights why focusing on your own medical evidence is the most important step in your claim. For preparation purposes, the guidance remains consistent regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions