SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Patrick Kilgannon

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 3,415 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's performance requires looking at consistent data sets. While Patrick Kilgannon maintains a 62% lifetime approval rate, his most recent reporting period shows a 77% approval rate, which sits 6 points above the Long Island office's latest-period average of 71%. These figures are drawn from 3,415 total decisions. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 62%
Decisions on record 3,415
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Kilgannon Long Island National
Approval rate 77% 71% 58%
Fully favorable 71%
Denials 23%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Kilgannon's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Kilgannon
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, your approval rate for Patrick Kilgannon has shown a notable upward trend. After hovering between 52% and 64% for much of the previous decade, the rate climbed to 74% in 2025 and 77% in 2026. This recent shift suggests a departure from his earlier decision patterns. The latest period reflects a continuation of this recent upward trajectory in favorable outcomes.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Kilgannon's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Long Island hearing office

The Long Island hearing office serves you across the region, operating as a critical hub for SSDI adjudication in New York. The office bench consists of 12 judges on record, maintaining a latest-period approval rate of 71%. You can expect a standard administrative process focused on medical evidence and vocational testimony. You can see the Long Island Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. The Long Island office features 12 judges on record since 2016, 7 of whom are reported in the latest SSA data. These judges exhibit a wide range of lifetime approval rates, spanning from 48% to 83%.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions