SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Marti Kirby

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 2,938 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes to ensure accuracy. While Kirby holds a 61% lifetime approval rate, recent data shows a 59% approval rate during the latest reporting period. This latest-period performance sits 5 points above the Moreno Valley office average of 54%. These figures are based on a substantial docket of 2,938 lifetime decisions, providing a stable view of past activity. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 61%
Decisions on record 2,938
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Kirby Moreno Valley National
Approval rate 59% 54% 58%
Fully favorable 48%
Denials 41%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Kirby's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Kirby
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval trend for Kirby has shown notable shifts since 2016. After a period of lower approval rates between 2019 and 2021, the data indicates a significant increase in approvals during 2022 and 2023, followed by a more recent stabilization. This pattern suggests that your judge's approach to evidence and case requirements has evolved over the last decade. The latest period reflects a continuation of this steady pattern as the judge processes current caseloads.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Kirby's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Moreno Valley hearing office

The Moreno Valley hearing office serves you throughout the region, acting as a central hub for disability hearings in California. With a bench of 7 judges on record, the office manages a diverse caseload of SSDI and SSI claims. The office-wide latest approval rate is 54%, reflecting the collective decision-making environment of the local bench.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Moreno Valley hearing office currently has 7 judges on record since 2016, with 4 judges reported in the latest SSA filing. Because the SSA uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, you cannot choose your judge. Approval rates across this office's bench vary significantly, ranging from 40% to 72% on lifetime records. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions