Elizabeth Watson is an SSA Administrative Law Judge at the Moreno Valley Hearing Office with a lifetime approval rate of 44% across 22,347 decisions. While this sits below the national average of 58%, your recent trends show an approval rate of 58% in the latest period. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing. An attorney can help you prepare for the specific requirements of this judge's courtroom.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
Judge Watson has presided over 22,347 lifetime decisions during a 10-year tenure. In the most recent reporting period, the judge recorded an approval rate of 58%, compared to the Moreno Valley office average of 53% and the national average of 58%. These figures provide a statistical look at how cases have been decided in this courtroom over time, rather than serving as a prediction for your specific hearing.
Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Watson's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
Over a decade on the bench, Judge Watson has seen fluctuations in approval rates, ranging from a low of 33% in 2021 to a high of 58% in 2025. The data shows a period of lower approval rates between 2020 and 2022, followed by an upward trend in recent years. This latest period reflects a more favorable trend compared to the judge's historical lifetime average. These patterns illustrate the evolution of the judge's decision-making over time.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Watson's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
Hearing with Judge Watson? See if a free benefits review fits your case.
Check My BenefitsAbout the Moreno Valley hearing office
The Moreno Valley Hearing Office serves a significant population of claimants across Southern California. With a bench of 6 judges, this office manages a high volume of cases to ensure timely hearings for you. The office-wide latest approval rate currently stands at 53%. You can see the Moreno Valley Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.
Other judges at this hearing office
The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. At the Moreno Valley Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the bench range from 37% to 60%. Because each judge manages their docket differently, understanding the office-wide environment is helpful for your preparation.
Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer
SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
