SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Peter N. Koclanes

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Charlottesville Hearing Office · 3 years on the bench · 3,994 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Koclanes?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

The approval rate for Judge Koclanes is calculated based on 3,994 lifetime decisions rendered during their tenure. In the most recent reporting period, the judge maintained an approval rate of 48%, which compares to an office-wide average of 44% and a national average of 58%. These figures provide a statistical snapshot of the judge's history rather than a guarantee of your future results.

Metric Judge Koclanes Charlottesville National
Approval rate 48% 44% 58%
Fully favorable 40%
Denials 52%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Koclanes's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Koclanes
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY23FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since joining the bench 3 years ago, Judge Koclanes has presided over a significant volume of cases. The yearly trend shows an approval rate of 61% in 2023, 46% in 2024, and 49% in 2025. This movement indicates that your judge's decision-making has stabilized following their initial period on the bench.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Koclanes's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Koclanes? See if a free benefits review fits your case.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Charlottesville hearing office

The Charlottesville Hearing Office serves you throughout the region, managing a diverse caseload of disability applications. The office currently operates with a bench of 6 judges, maintaining an office-wide latest approval rate of 44%. You can expect a standard hearing process focused on your medical evidence and vocational testimony. You can see the Charlottesville Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases to judges using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning your assignment is essentially random. Within the Charlottesville Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the bench range from 39% to 82%. Because your assigned judge is determined by administrative factors, understanding the broader office environment is useful.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions