SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. John Kooser

Last decided Seven FieldsJul 2026
Decisions 4,067since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes to understand how you perform relative to your peers. While the office bench ranges from 33% to 72% in approval rates since 2016, recent data shows John Kooser at a 77% approval rate in the latest period. This latest-period performance sits 7 points above the office average of 70%, 23 points above the state average of 54%, and 19 points above the national average of 58%.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 72%
Decisions on record 4,067
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Kooser Seven Fields National
Approval rate 77% 70% 58%
Fully favorable 69% — —
Denials 23% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Kooser's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Kooser
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since January 2016, John Kooser has issued 4,067 decisions on record. His yearly approval trend shows a period of fluctuation followed by a recent rise, with the latest-period approval rate of 77% diverging from his long-term average. This recent uptick may reflect changes in case mix or evidence quality.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Kooser's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Seven Fields hearing office

John Kooser's most recent office on record is the Seven Fields hearing office, which serves you across Pennsylvania. This office is part of a broader regional network handling a high volume of disability appeals. With 10 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, the office maintains an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 70%.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Seven Fields

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you draw is essentially random. There are 10 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, and 6 of them decided cases here in the latest file through July 2026. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 33% to 72% since 2016.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions