SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Brian W. Wood

Last decided Seven FieldsJul 2026
Decisions 3,782since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

To understand how Brian W. Wood compares to the broader bench, you can look at approval rates across the same reporting periods. While the judge maintains a 64% approval rate since 2016, the office's bench shows a range of outcomes from 33% to 72%. In the most recent reporting period, the judge's 66% approval rate sits 4 points below the office average of 70%, but 12 points above the state average of 54%.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 64%
Decisions on record 3,782
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Wood Seven Fields National
Approval rate 66% 70% 58%
Fully favorable 55% — —
Denials 34% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Wood's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Wood
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, Brian W. Wood has presided over 3,782 decisions. The yearly approval trend shows fluctuation, peaking at 73% in 2025 before settling to 65% in the most recent partial fiscal year. This recent figure remains consistent with the judge's long-term average on record. The latest period reflects a continuation of this steady pattern, indicating that the judge's approach to evidence and case requirements has remained stable.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Wood's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Seven Fields hearing office

Brian W. Wood's most recent office on record is the Seven Fields hearing office. This office maintains a latest-period approval rate of 70%. You can see the Seven Fields hearing office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Seven Fields

The Social Security Administration assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 10 judges whose most recent office on record is this one. Approval rates among this group vary significantly, ranging from 33% to 72% on their records since 2016.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions