SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Judith A. Kopec

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Stockton Hearing Office · 7 years on the bench · 14,067 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Kopec?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's performance to broader benchmarks provides context for your upcoming hearing. Judge Kopec maintains a lifetime approval rate of 61%, which currently stands 17 percentage points higher than the latest Stockton Hearing Office average of 44%. These figures are derived from a significant docket of 14,067 lifetime decisions built over 7 years. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Metric Judge Kopec Stockton National
Approval rate 61% 44% 58%
Fully favorable 52%
Denials 39%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Kopec's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Kopec
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY22
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over her 7-year tenure, Judge Kopec has demonstrated a consistent approach to disability adjudication. Her yearly approval trends show a steady pattern, moving from 52% in 2016 to a peak of 69% in 2021, before settling at 66% in 2022. This trajectory suggests a stable decision-making philosophy that has remained well-aligned with or above national standards throughout her time on the bench.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Kopec's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Kopec? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Stockton hearing office

The Stockton Hearing Office serves a large population of claimants across California, managing a high volume of cases with a diverse bench of 6 judges. The office currently reports an average approval rate of 44%, reflecting the complex nature of the claims processed in this region. You can expect a formal hearing process where medical documentation and vocational testimony are prioritized. See the Stockton Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning you cannot choose your judge. At the Stockton Hearing Office, the bench is comprised of 6 judges whose lifetime approval rates range from 30% to 83%. Because this variance exists, it is important to focus on the strength of your medical evidence regardless of who is assigned to your case.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions