Emilie Kraft's most recent office on record is the Birmingham hearing office, with decisions there through July 2026. Across the 3,937 decisions on record since 2016, 52% have been approved. Judges whose most recent office on record is this one range from 28% to 85% on their since-2016 records, and case assignment is random. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings. An attorney can help you prepare for your hearing.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes. While the bench at the Birmingham office shows a range of outcomes from 28% to 85% on their records since 2016, Emilie Kraft maintains a 52% approval rate over the same period. In the most recent reporting period, her 54% approval rate sits 5 points above the office average of 49%. These figures reflect historical trends rather than individual case outcomes.
Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Kraft's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
The approval trend for Emilie Kraft has fluctuated since 2016, moving from 53% in 2016 to 55% in the partial 2026 fiscal year. With 3,937 total decisions on record, the data reflects a consistent approach to case evaluation. The latest period shows a slight increase compared to the overall average, providing a baseline for understanding how evidence is weighed in this courtroom.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Kraft's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
About the Birmingham hearing office
Emilie Kraft's most recent office on record is the Birmingham hearing office, with decisions there through July 2026. This office serves claimants across Alabama and is part of a regional network responsible for processing disability claims. With 23 judges on the bench, the office maintains an office-wide latest approval rate of 49%.
Other judges whose most recent office on record is Birmingham
The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 23 judges whose most recent office on record is the Birmingham office. Because approval rates across this bench vary significantly, the specific judge assigned to your case is a factor in the process. Preparation remains essential regardless of which judge you are assigned.
Approval rates change with a lawyer
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
Frequently asked questions
Emilie Kraft's 52% approval rate since 2016 sits within the broader range of 28% to 85% seen among the 23 judges whose most recent office on record is Birmingham. In the most recent reporting period, her 54% approval rate is 5 points higher than the office average of 49%. An attorney can help you prepare for the specific nuances of this courtroom.
Emilie Kraft's approval rate has remained steady, starting at 53% in 2016 and reaching 55% in the partial 2026 fiscal year. The overall 52% rate across 3,937 decisions indicates a consistent decision-making pattern. An attorney can help you evaluate your case strategy based on these trends.
No, you cannot request a specific judge. The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, making the assignment process random. An attorney can help you prepare a strong case that meets the evidentiary standards regardless of who is assigned.
An SSDI hearing is a formal proceeding where you, your attorney, and potentially a vocational or medical expert appear before the judge. The judge will ask questions about your work history, medical conditions, and daily limitations to determine if you meet the criteria for disability. An attorney can help you prepare for these questions and present your medical evidence effectively.
An approval rate is a statistical summary of past decisions and is not a prediction of how Emilie Kraft will rule on your specific claim. Your outcome depends primarily on the quality of your medical evidence and how well your limitations are documented. An attorney can help you ensure your file is complete and ready for your hearing.




