SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Michael A. Krasnow

Last decided WashingtonJul 2026
Decisions 3,111since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same period. While Michael A. Krasnow has a 33% approval rate on record since 2016, recent performance shows a 36% approval rate in the latest reporting period. This latest-period figure sits 27 percentage points below the Washington office average of 63%. These statistics are derived from a docket of 3,111 decisions, providing a view of past trends.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 33%
Decisions on record 3,111
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Krasnow Washington National
Approval rate 36% 63% 58%
Fully favorable 32% — —
Denials 64% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Krasnow's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Krasnow
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Michael A. Krasnow has fluctuated since 2016. After reaching a low of 25% in 2022, the rate increased to 42% in 2023 before settling at 36% in the most recent period. This latest-period approval rate remains consistent with the broader pattern observed over the last few years.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Krasnow's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Washington hearing office

Michael A. Krasnow's most recent office on record is the Washington hearing office, with decisions there through July 2026. This office serves claimants in the District of Columbia and surrounding regions. With a bench of 33 judges, the office maintains its own operational standards and latest-period approval rates.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Washington

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge assigned to your case is essentially random. There are 33 judges whose most recent office on record is the Washington hearing office. Approval rates for this bench range from 29% to 85% on their since-2016 records.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions