SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Mary M. Kunz

Last decided MinneapolisSep 2017
Decisions 527since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same time periods to ensure accuracy. The 44% approval rate for Mary M. Kunz reflects her decisions on record since 2016, which can be evaluated against the 33% to 68% range of other judges whose most recent office on record is also Minneapolis. These figures provide a statistical baseline derived from hundreds of cases, though they do not predict your specific outcome.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 44%
Decisions on record 527

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Kunz. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 29, 2017. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Kunz's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Kunz
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY17
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Mary M. Kunz across 527 decisions on record since 2016 shows a slight downward trend. In 2016, your approval rate was 46% over 471 decisions, followed by 40% over 207 decisions in 2017. This pattern highlights how your individual case evidence and legal arguments remain the primary drivers of your hearing outcome.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Kunz's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Minneapolis hearing office

Mary M. Kunz's most recent office on record is the Minneapolis hearing office, with decisions there through September 2017. This office serves you across Minnesota and the surrounding region. With 14 judges whose most recent office on record is this location, the bench represents a variety of decision patterns.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Minneapolis

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you draw is essentially random. There are 14 judges whose most recent office on record is Minneapolis, with approval rates ranging from 33% to 68% on their since-2016 records. Because you cannot choose your judge, focusing on the strength of your medical evidence is the most effective way to prepare.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions