SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Maria N. Kusznir

Last decided MontgomerySep 2018
Decisions 1,049since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same timeframe. The 67% approval rate for Maria N. Kusznir reflects all decisions on record since 2016, which can be measured against the 21% to 92% range observed among the 17 judges whose most recent office on record is the Montgomery hearing office. These figures provide a statistical baseline for understanding how different benches operate.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 67%
Decisions on record 1,049

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Kusznir. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 28, 2018. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Kusznir's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Kusznir
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY18
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The 1,049 decisions on record for Maria N. Kusznir since 2016 show a shift in approval trends over time. While the approval rate stood at 70% in 2016 and 69% in 2017, the record shows a decline to 60% in 2018. This pattern indicates that the frequency of approvals changed during the final portion of the available data window.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Kusznir's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Montgomery hearing office

The Montgomery hearing office serves you and other claimants across Alabama. With 17 judges whose most recent office on record is this location, the office manages a diverse range of SSDI claims. You should be prepared for a thorough review of your medical documentation and work history.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Montgomery

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 17 judges whose most recent office on record is the Montgomery hearing office, with approval rates ranging from 21% to 92% based on their individual records since 2016. Because each judge maintains their own approach to evaluating medical evidence and vocational testimony, the specific judge assigned to your case is a significant variable.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions