SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Ricky V. South

Last decided MontgomeryJul 2026
Decisions 4,386since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

When evaluating your hearing, it is helpful to compare the 69% approval rate on record since 2016 against the broader bench at the Montgomery hearing office, where individual judge approval rates range from 21% to 92%. In the most recent reporting period, the 70% approval rate sits 1 percentage point below the office average of 71%, while remaining 8 points above the Alabama state average of 62%. These figures provide context based on a significant volume of decisions, though they do not predict the outcome of your specific case.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 69%
Decisions on record 4,386
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge South Montgomery National
Approval rate 70% 71% 58%
Fully favorable 69% — —
Denials 30% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge South's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge South
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since January 2016, 4,386 decisions have been issued. The approval trend has remained steady in recent years, with the rate holding at 69% or 70% consistently from 2023 through the partial 2026 fiscal year. This consistency suggests that the latest period reflects a continuation of the established trend observed throughout the time on record.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge South's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Montgomery hearing office

The Montgomery hearing office serves you and other claimants throughout Alabama and the surrounding region. As of the most recent data, 17 judges have their most recent office on record at this location, which maintains an office-wide approval rate of 71% for the latest reporting period. You can expect a standard hearing process focused on the medical and vocational evidence presented in your file.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Montgomery

The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 17 judges whose most recent office on record is the Montgomery hearing office, and 9 of them decided cases here in SSA's latest file through July 2026. Because approval rates across this bench vary widely from 21% to 92%, your specific assignment is a factor in your hearing process.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions