SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Jeffrey P. La Vicka

Last decided MorgantownJul 2026
Decisions 3,577since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

The approval rates for Jeffrey P. LA Vicka are based on 3,577 decisions on record since 2016. When evaluating these figures, it is helpful to compare the judge's performance against the broader bench at the Morgantown hearing office, where since-2016 approval rates range from 21% to 67%. In the most recent reporting period, the judge's approval rate was 58%, compared to the office-wide rate of 60%. These aggregate rates reflect past trends rather than specific outcomes for your hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 49%
Decisions on record 3,577
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge La Vicka Morgantown National
Approval rate 58% 60% 58%
Fully favorable 56% — —
Denials 42% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge La Vicka's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge La Vicka
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, Jeffrey P. LA Vicka has maintained a consistent volume of activity, with 3,577 total decisions on record. The yearly trend shows fluctuations in approval rates, beginning at 42% in 2016 and reaching 58% in the most recent fiscal year-to-date period. While the approval rate dipped in 2018, the data shows a general upward trajectory in recent years. The latest period reflects a continuation of this steady pattern.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge La Vicka's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Morgantown hearing office

Jeffrey P. LA Vicka's most recent office on record is the Morgantown hearing office, which serves you across West Virginia. This office is home to 10 judges who manage a high volume of disability hearings. The office-wide approval rate in the latest reporting period was 60%, providing a benchmark for the region. You can see the Morgantown Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Morgantown

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge assigned to your hearing is essentially random. There are 10 judges whose most recent office on record is the Morgantown hearing office, with 4 of them deciding cases in the latest file from July 2026. Approval rates among this group vary significantly, ranging from 21% to 67% on their records since 2016. Preparation remains consistent regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions