SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Lissette Labrousse

Last decided Ft LauderdaleJul 2026
Decisions 3,491since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing the performance of Lissette Labrousse requires looking at both long-term and recent data. While the 40% approval rate on record since 2016 provides a broad view of history, the latest-period approval rate of 45% offers a more current snapshot. These figures are best understood when compared to the 21% to 87% range of other judges whose most recent office on record is the Ft Lauderdale hearing office. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 40%
Decisions on record 3,491
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Labrousse Ft Lauderdale National
Approval rate 45% 51% 58%
Fully favorable 30% — —
Denials 55% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Labrousse's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Labrousse
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, Lissette Labrousse has issued 3,491 decisions. The yearly approval trend shows fluctuation, moving from 47% in 2016 to a low of 34% in 2022, before reaching 45% in the most recent partial year. While the latest-period approval rate of 45% sits 6 points below the office average of 51%, the recent data reflects a shift in the volume of favorable outcomes.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Labrousse's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Ft Lauderdale hearing office

The Ft Lauderdale hearing office serves you and other applicants across Florida. With 19 judges whose most recent office on record is this location, the office maintains an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 51%. You can expect a standard hearing process focused on your medical evidence and vocational testimony.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Ft Lauderdale

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 19 judges whose most recent office on record is the Ft Lauderdale hearing office, 10 of whom decided cases here in the latest file through July 2026. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 21% to 87% on their records since 2016.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions