SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Jerry M. Lang

Last decided MemphisJul 2026
Decisions 3,779since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing performance requires looking at consistent timeframes. While you see a 51% approval rate across the entire record since 2016, recent data shows a 54% approval rate during the latest reporting period. This latest figure sits 1 percentage point below the Memphis hearing office's latest-period rate of 55%. These figures provide a statistical baseline for understanding the docket, though aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 51%
Decisions on record 3,779
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Lang Memphis National
Approval rate 54% 55% 58%
Fully favorable 51% — —
Denials 46% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Lang's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Lang
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since January 2016, Jerry M. Lang has issued 3,779 decisions. The yearly approval trend has remained relatively steady, showing minor fluctuations. While the approval rate dipped to 48% in 2023, it reached 54% in the most recent fiscal year-to-date period. This recent performance reflects a consistent approach to evaluating evidence in your disability claim.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Lang's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Memphis hearing office

Jerry M. Lang's most recent office on record is the Memphis hearing office, which serves you and other claimants across Tennessee and the surrounding region. This office maintains a bench of 14 judges, and the office-wide latest-period approval rate is 55%. You can expect a standard administrative hearing process focused on your medical evidence and vocational testimony.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Memphis

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. At the Memphis hearing office, there are 14 judges whose most recent office on record is this one. Approval rates among these peers range from 44% to 80% on their records since 2016. Your preparation remains the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions