SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Robert Hodum

On record 4,038 decisions since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing Robert Hodum's record to the broader Memphis bench provides context for your upcoming hearing. While the judge's lifetime approval rate sits at 55%, the office-wide lifetime range spans from 44% to 80%, reflecting the diversity of decision-making styles at this location. Latest-period data shows the judge approving cases at a rate 4 percentage points higher than the office average. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 55%
Decisions on record 4,038
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Hodum Memphis National
Approval rate 59% 55% 58%
Fully favorable 50%
Denials 41%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Hodum's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Hodum
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, Robert Hodum has presided over 4,038 decisions. The yearly trend shows a period of steady activity, with approval rates fluctuating between 47% and 65% over the last decade. The most recent reporting period shows an approval rate of 59%, which remains consistent with the judge's long-term historical performance. This stability suggests a predictable approach to evidence evaluation, though your case remains unique.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Hodum's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Memphis hearing office

The Memphis hearing office serves you throughout Tennessee and the surrounding region. It is staffed by a bench of 14 judges who manage a high volume of disability claims. The office-wide latest-period approval rate is 55%, providing a baseline for the local judicial environment. For more information on the full roster, see the Memphis hearing office page.

Other judges at this hearing office

The SSA assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning your assignment to Robert Hodum is essentially random. There are 14 judges on record at this office since 2016, 7 of whom reported in the latest period. Because approval rates vary significantly across the bench, ranging from 44% to 80% lifetime, understanding the office environment is helpful. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions