SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Carol L. Latham

Last decided MontgomeryJul 2026
Decisions 3,740since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing your judge's approval rate to the broader bench provides a baseline for understanding the hearing environment. While your judge's 39% approval rate on record since 2016 reflects a specific history, the 21% to 92% range among other judges at the Montgomery office highlights the variance in outcomes. Latest-period data shows your judge at 49% approval, compared to the office-wide rate of 71%.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 39%
Decisions on record 3,740
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Latham Montgomery National
Approval rate 49% 71% 58%
Fully favorable 44% — —
Denials 51% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Latham's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Latham
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Your judge's approval rate has fluctuated since 2016. After an initial period of lower approval rates, your judge saw an uptick in 2022 and 2023, followed by a decline in 2024 and a return to higher levels in 2025 and 2026. With 3,740 total decisions on record, these shifts illustrate how case mix and evidence quality influence annual outcomes.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Latham's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Montgomery hearing office

Carol L. Latham's most recent office on record is the Montgomery hearing office, with decisions there through July 2026. This office serves claimants across Alabama. With 17 judges on the bench, the office maintains a latest-period approval rate of 71%. You can expect a formal administrative process where evidence quality is the primary driver of your outcome.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Montgomery

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you draw is essentially random. There are 17 judges whose most recent office on record is the Montgomery hearing office. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 21% to 92% on their since-2016 records.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions