SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. William Lawson

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Birmingham Hearing Office · 10 years on the bench · 22,389 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Lawson?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Judge Lawson maintains a lifetime approval rate of 77% across 22,389 lifetime decisions. In the most recent reporting period, his approval rate of 77% stands 25 points above the Birmingham office average of 52% and 19 points above the national average of 58%. This data reflects a significant volume of cases, providing a stable look at his decision-making history. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Metric Judge Lawson Birmingham National
Approval rate 77% 52% 58%
Fully favorable 70%
Denials 23%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Lawson's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Lawson
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over his 10-year tenure, Judge Lawson has shown a resilient approval pattern. While his annual rates fluctuated between 69% and 82%, the most recent data shows he remains at a 77% approval rate. This consistency suggests a stable approach to evaluating your evidence and medical documentation. The recent period reflects a continuation of this steady pattern, indicating that his approach to disability claims has remained reliable over time.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Lawson's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Lawson? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Birmingham hearing office

The Birmingham Hearing Office serves a large population across Alabama, managing a high volume of disability claims. With a bench of 6 judges, the office handles complex cases involving 20 CFR Part 404 regulations. The office-wide latest approval rate is 52%, reflecting the diverse nature of cases heard in this region. You can view the Birmingham Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases to judges using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning your assignment is essentially random. Across the Birmingham Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates for the bench range from 38% to 77%. Because of this variance, the judge you draw can influence the context of your hearing. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions