SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Michael A. Lehr

Last decided Kansas CityJul 2026
Decisions 3,477since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

The approval rates for Michael A. Lehr reflect a significant body of work, with 3,477 decisions on record since 2016. When comparing his performance to the broader bench at the Kansas City office, he sits within a range of 33% to 77% observed among his peers. In the most recent reporting period, his 76% approval rate stands 20 percentage points above the office average of 56%. These figures represent historical trends rather than a fixed outcome for your case.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 65%
Decisions on record 3,477
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Lehr Kansas City National
Approval rate 76% 56% 58%
Fully favorable 70% — —
Denials 24% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Lehr's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Lehr
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, the approval rate for Michael A. Lehr has shown a dynamic trend. After experiencing a period of lower approval rates between 2020 and 2022, the data shows a consistent upward trajectory in recent years. The latest reporting period, with a 76% approval rate, reflects a continuation of this recent pattern of higher allowance rates compared to his long-term average. This shift highlights the importance of current medical evidence in your hearing.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Lehr's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Kansas City hearing office

The Kansas City Hearing Office serves claimants across Missouri and the surrounding region. It is staffed by a bench of 17 judges whose most recent office on record is this location. The office-wide approval rate in the latest reporting period was 56%, providing a baseline for the local administrative environment. You can see the Kansas City Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Kansas City

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the specific judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 17 judges whose most recent office on record is the Kansas City office, 12 of whom decided cases in the latest file from July 2026. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 33% to 77% on records since 2016. Your preparation remains the most critical factor in your hearing outcome.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions