SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Robert Lenzini

Last decided OrangeJul 2026
Decisions 3,202since 2017

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing Robert Lenzini's performance requires looking at both his long-term record and recent trends. His 61% approval rate since 2017 sits within the 19% to 68% range observed among the 12 judges whose most recent office on record is the Orange hearing office. In the latest reporting period, his 77% approval rate outperformed the office average by 18 percentage points. These figures reflect historical trends rather than specific outcomes for your case.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2017
Approval rate 61%
Decisions on record 3,202
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Lenzini Orange National
Approval rate 77% 59% 58%
Fully favorable 66% — —
Denials 23% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Lenzini's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Lenzini
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY17FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since January 2017, Robert Lenzini has issued 3,202 decisions. His yearly approval trend has fluctuated, showing a rise in recent years compared to his earlier record. While his approval rate was 40% in 2017, it reached 81% in 2025 and is 77% in the partial 2026 fiscal year data. This recent performance reflects a shift from his historical average, suggesting that the latest period diverges from his long-term pattern.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Lenzini's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Orange hearing office

Robert Lenzini's most recent office on record is the Orange hearing office, with decisions there through July 2026. This office serves the California region and maintains a bench of 12 judges whose most recent office on record is this location. The office-wide latest-period approval rate is 59%, providing context for the local hearing environment.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Orange

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 12 judges whose most recent office on record is the Orange hearing office, and 4 of them decided cases here in the latest file through July 2026. Approval rates for this bench range from 19% to 68% on their records since 2016. Your preparation remains consistent regardless of which judge is assigned to your case.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions