SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Alexander G. Levine

Last decided BronxSep 2021
Decisions 1,761since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same timeframe to ensure accuracy. The 67% approval rate for Alexander G. Levine reflects his total decisions on record since 2016, which can be measured against the 43% to 84% range of his peers at the Bronx hearing office. Because these figures are based on 1,761 decisions, they provide a stable view of past activity. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 67%
Decisions on record 1,761

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Levine. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 24, 2021. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Levine's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Levine
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY21
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Alexander G. Levine has fluctuated over the years, starting at 70% in 2016 and reaching 82% by 2021. With 1,761 decisions on record since 2016, the data shows a trend that dipped in 2019 before rising in the final years of his recorded activity. This pattern suggests that the approach to evidence or case mix evolved over time. The recent uptick in the final period reflects a departure from the lower rates observed in 2019.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Levine's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Bronx hearing office

The Bronx hearing office has seen 16 judges with records since 2016. This office handles a volume of disability claims, and you can expect a review of your medical evidence. Understanding the local bench is a part of preparing for your hearing. You can see the Bronx Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Bronx

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you draw is essentially random. There are 16 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, with approval rates ranging from 43% to 84%. While these peers operate within the same office, their individual patterns vary. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions