SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Charles R. Lindsay

Last decided ShreveportSep 2019
Decisions 1,653since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's performance requires looking at consistent data windows. Charles R. Lindsay's 43% approval rate on record since 2016 sits within the 38% to 79% range observed among the 6 judges whose most recent office on record is Shreveport. This range provides a clear view of how different benches handle disability claims. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 43%
Decisions on record 1,653

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Lindsay. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 27, 2019. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Lindsay's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Lindsay
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY19
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Charles R. Lindsay has shown a varied trend across the 1,653 decisions on record since 2016. After an initial 47% approval rate in 2016, the figures were 40% in 2017, 44% in 2018, and 38% in 2019. This pattern reflects the inherent variability in disability adjudication over time. The data suggests that the decision-making process remains sensitive to the specific evidence you present in your case.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Lindsay's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Shreveport hearing office

Charles R. Lindsay's most recent office on record is the Shreveport hearing office, with decisions there through September 2019. This office serves claimants across Louisiana and is part of a regional network of SSA hearing sites. With a bench of 6 judges on record, the office maintains a consistent process for evaluating disability claims. You can see the Shreveport Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Shreveport

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 6 judges whose most recent office on record is Shreveport. These judges show a wide range of approval rates, from 38% to 79% on their since-2016 records. For your preparation, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions